Comodo,

“Be it an eCommerce site interacting with a payments processor, or with a new mashup technology, Internet applications continue their relentless march. Consumers get their functionality from multiple interacting web services now,” said James Langman, VP of Business Development at Comodo Group Inc. “In this new environment it is critical for web applications interacting through a user’s browser to be able to establish a secure, mutually-authenticated channel, even in the presence of a potentially malicious user. SafeMashups’ innovative MashSSL repurposes the tried and tested SSL infrastructure to solve this issue.”

read more

More: continued here

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
  • Technorati

Related News


  • Data


  • Depending on how IT executives handle the situation, reactions to data loss reports can range from indignation to outrage, with personal consequences for the decision-makers. IT executives at ChoicePoint, Inc., looked like heroes when they reacted swiftly to a potential data breach in 2005. More often, though, leaky data pipes lead to unpleasant consequences for the executives responsible: from public outrage to protests and unemployment. HackerGuardian from Comodo helps IT executives detect and prevent catastrophic data losses.read more


  • NetApp


  • Long-time NetApp CEO Dan Warmenhoven is stepping down, replaced by Tom Georgens, who became president and COO early last year. Warmenhoven remains chairman and picks up the newly created title of executive chairman which means he will focus on building partner and customer relationships. The move coincides with the cloud-induced shift in infrastructure and NetApp’s loss of Data Domain and its growth potential to EMC.read more


  • EC


  • In a change of pace regarding the EC (European Commission) and their view of competition the early returns are that the partnership between Yahoo and Microsoft will not be given a difficult time gaining approval. While the EC has been a stumbling block to other deals including both companies in the past (Yahoo’s previous issue was when there was the propsect of a Google / Yahoo partnership – having Google attached to any competitive issue makes it more interesting for sure). This particular situation doesn’t seem to pose problems although that position has not been officially stated by the EC itself. ClickZ reports A spokesperson for the European Commission — the branch responsible for anti-trust scrutiny in the E.U. — said last week that it “has not been informed about the details of the transaction,” and that it “keeps this sector, as others, under review, but cannot comment further at this stage.” However, Christopher Thomas, a Brussels-based competition partner at law firm Lovells, told ClickZ that Microsoft and Yahoo now “appear to be in discussion with the Commission about the deal.”The EC will take this position, of course, because there is so much to look at which requires time and more information. What is interesting is how various legal eagles and pundits are looking at this and predicting that there should be no problems. Why? Because the impact on the competitive environment in Europe posed by this partnership will be nominal at best.Ouch. Two of the biggest names in the Internet and technology space combine forces in a way that is significantly different that ever before and it barely merits a hiccup in Europe?Douglas Lahnborg, Competition Partner at law firm Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, said, “It is inconceivable that the deal would be blocked by the Commission. I don’t see what competition arguments could be raised against it given the parties’ limited market position. Any investigation will be a formality.”Lahnborg suggested the combined European market share of the two entities — estimated at around 4 percent — would still be too small to raise concerns. “In an industry where the number two and number three players command 20 percent market share each, the deal wouldn’t be allowed to go ahead. But considering Google has around 90 percent of the market, that argument is inconceivable,” he said. “Google has a formidable market position, and this relationship could offer advertisers a credible alternative,” he added.So the lawyers’ early look at the situation seems to indicate clear sailing when the time comes. Of course, this begs the question of “What will Google do?”. Does anyone think that Google is just going to let this happen without at least causing Microhoo to work for it in both the US and elsewhere? Why do you think Google has lined up its firepower in Washington DC anyway and likely in other parts of the world? For the common good? If the common good is defined as Google’s good then yes. Not that there’s anything wrong with that. It is just business after all, right?Comments


  • Tuxera


  • Tuxera, a company based around the NTFS-3G filesystem project, seems tohave come up with a new line of business based on the recent FAT patentscare: they have signed a deal with Microsoft and are offering proprietary"exFAT" filesystem drivers for Linux. "As an open source company, we feel excited to sign an intellectual property agreement with Microsoft. They are a great partner, and I am confident that our agreements, and this collaboration, will ensure a bright future for file system interoperability and data portability that benefits device manufacturers and consumers alike."


  • Microsoft


  • Microsoft and Intuit are going to join their clouds, Azure and the Intuit Partner Platform (IPP), so developers can deliver and market web applications to the 27 million QuickBooks-using small businesses through the Intuit App Center. The integration also means that small businesses can use Microsoft’s cloud-based productivity applications via the Intuit App Center, presumably heading off some losses to Google Apps and Zoho. read more


    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.